this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
882 points (97.4% liked)

Work Reform

17329 readers
3710 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Flock has installed about 100k units with 45w of solar capacity, for about 5MW of capacity.

The US is installing about 7GW of new solar quarterly.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just the solar panels. It's the cost of the cameras and the subscription. It's just beginning as well... these cameras are barely even there at this point... give it time.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, but not the argument presented.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Rolling out a large amount of any type of infrastructure is similar when it comes to just dollars. Governments around the country can roll out hundreds of billions of dollars in flock camera equipment...all of the sudden? Why haven't they rolled out solar generation before this using that found money...billions.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Okay but... Municipalities dont pay for capex beyond the install. Install costs are under 3k each, so less than $300M total?

Vs solar at around $70B per year.

Even if they were footing the bill, do you really think these cameras cost $2M each?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Yearly subscription service is where flock makes their money. And cities are just scratching the surface on what they will be spending on flock.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Seriously, the kind of “gotcha” statement that OP is going for is really harmful to the movement because it’s so out of touch and incorrect.