this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
890 points (97.4% liked)

Work Reform

17339 readers
3466 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So you're saying we have big areas that are already being used for something else that would need to be at least partially demolished in order to accommodate the infrastructure?

... Something that is way more difficult than popping a pole in the ground.

Look, I am 100% for renewables and have about 500W of panels for small things at home, I am not saying "don't do everything possible to distribute power over as many places that can be retrofitted as possible" I'm saying the OP meme is a bad comparison.

Rooftop solar, parking lot solar, balconies with solar panels bolted on, bring on the distributed power grid. Bare minimum every country engaging in warfare should WANT solar everywhere since it makes it MUCH harder for anyone to attack power production facilities and take down important and significant portions of the grid. That alone makes their power grid much more secure, if not "under government control".

I'd love to have a hybrid wind/solar setup, I live next to some fields and forest, andon top of a hill. So I get plenty of wind all year round and on the far end of the driveway I have a bit area for solar panels with great LOS for the sun from about 10am until sunset. I just don't have the money.

So yeah, I'm all for sinking our tax dollars into a solar revolution (especially when considering what the country ACTUALLY spends money on) but the meme is a bad meme making a false equivalence.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Where did he said that for that someone should demolish the rooftop of an hospital or, even more absurd, an open-air parking lot? You're just making a straw man fallacy, because you're distorting what he said so you can deny it more easy instead of trying to actually respond to what he actually said.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 days ago

If you think things can be retrofitted for solar without partially dismantling, digging, or otherwise requiring, as stated, partial demolition, I've got a bridge to Alaska to sell you.

And also as stated, I am in no way against doing these things.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Hrmm, this got me thinking a little actually. Where I am, there isn’t much wind, but other provinces do, we were mainly coal and LPG powered, still are. But solar is on the upswing, our city has multiple massive solar farms.

Anyways, what got me thinking is why we don’t have wind as well, I’m wondering if just due to the almost daily wind spikes being on the east side of the Rockies? How often would the be locked out would make them unfeasible?

Maybe there’s some study on it I can dig up later.