this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

67323 readers
1507 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't seem to find anything like it, neither as a Fuse fs. Is there really no file system, that just evicts the oldest entries once it's full? I mean, it could be a simple queue.

This would have been the ideal tool for cache; no bothering with size limits and background daemons.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are you trying to build/do?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Uncomplicated cache/trash management

  • try 1) I could have a cronjob to parse the cache directory for old files or if it gets full... - scratch that, it would get to a rather complex script with multiple rules.
  • try 2) a systemd service, relying on dbus calls, like the big distros do? No, that breaks even more outside of their ecosystem and i don't like bloaty DE.
  • try 3) or i could just have a partition in size of choice that "forgets" old files once full?

But sadly, doesn't seem to exist. Maybe i will have to learn how to create a fs? It's only a stack, would also be fast...

[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds like you want to automate Trash folder management. Why would number 1 require complex rules if number 3 can work with only the rule of delete the oldest file? Wouldn't the same rule work in both cases?

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

3) is what those fraudulent flash drives on amazon that are sold as much higher capacity than they actually are do.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Nah, that one forgets new files.