this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
981 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87446 readers
3814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Come to think of it, how accurately can facial recognition tell apart to people who look very similar?

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 3 points 14 hours ago

It can't.

Also, and I have no idea what race this person is, but facial recognition tents to be even worse when it comes to minority groups, especially black people. Because its more often created and tested by white or asian dudes.

Which has absolutely terrible implications when you consider it gets used for things like Flock, for crimes, which already have a racism problem skewed against black people.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zero. Zero accurately. They don't even talk about it, because they don't care. The arbitrary cruelty is a bonus feature.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I bet the manufacturers of these surveillance systems leave a wink wink way for authorities to slip a name in their systems as a hit for something too.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Facial recognition has an inherent bias as well, or at least it did not too long ago. It was mostly trained on white people, so it's accuracy with non whites was really bad. I'm sure the training data is far more robust now, but that doesn't necessarily mean better.

[–] ToastedCoconuts@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not at all, but that’s the court’s problem I guess.