this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026

124 points (97.0% liked)

science

28729 readers

363 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

124

Staggering 90% of biomedical papers now show signs of AI help (www.nature.com)

submitted 1 week ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and correctness of their work. What tools they use is no concern of mine.

[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you.

"Oooh they used AI, fuck them" is mostly a stance taken by people who weren't ever going to engage with the papers as is. The only reason these people are concerned about this is because "oooo AI bad bad bad".

I swear, there's no difference between these folks and the "all natural, herbal" hippies. Total lack of scientific temperament, total lack of nuance. No intention of getting to the truth. Just screaming what their perceived "ideological team" has to say about this. Just like the Bible thumpers they claim to despise.