Maybe it's a good idea to listen to someone who publishes papers on this very subject, and is a professor of both philosophy and psychiatry and directs an Institute for Cognitive Science. That person is Dr. Chandra Sripada and his insights are fascinating.

Sean Carroll (interviewer, scientist and science communicator) says this interview made him lean towards the answer being "yes, they think like humans" whereas previously he favored the opposite view.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mapto@feddit.bg 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I personally have huge doubts about the methodological merits of phenomenology. Consider this as a starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(psychology)

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh, completely agree! In a way that was the point being made by the interviewee (Sripada)

That cognitive psych had been stuck for decades with a well-documented robust phenomenology, but no really good, biologically-plausible, mechanistic models.

And then suddenly LLMs show up -- an actual technological artifact non-trivially displaying much of the same phenomenology, biologically motivated, and completely mechanistic.