World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Ok, but he needs to shut the fuck up until a deal is signed, he can politically posture later.
Why? Deals with Trump mean nothing. The best thing to do is strengthen our border and ignore that pants-shitting rapist.
Or we can tell Trump to shut the fuck up and let him politically posture later. When he tries to hurt us, endure the pain, because every second of it makes us stronger and makes him weaker. Do not negotiate with terrorists.
I wish my loss adverse fellow citizens who have been losing since FDR could see it this clearly.
I disagree. We need a good deal or none at all. And we are certainly not going to get a good deal between the narcissistic incompetent and Ol’ Schrodinger’s Elbows.
Wab smells B.S. and I’m here for it.
Nah, the only problem with what he said was he should've called Trump a "nasty person".
When you're negotiating, it's courteous to speak the language of the people you're negotiating with.
And I'm not kidding, either. JD Vance called Trump "America's Hitler." Trump chose him to be his running mate. Nothing Trump says is meaningful, it's all just for show. So he thinks everyone else only says things for show. Insulting him won't hurt a deal, if anything it's make him want to make a deal more.
Death to America.
Hard agree, as someone who voted for Wab as my MLA. I wish he and Ford would stop fucking around and just let the federal government retain the jurisdiction over foreign affairs. Ford's Reagan ad was factual and "felt good" for Canadians to see but really stirred the pot.
Trump is the one wiping his ass with NAFTA and now USMCA. They are not the ones stirring the pot. Anyway, provinces have a lot of say in who they trade with and if they want to make it hurt for states that violate trade agreements, then good for them.
I understand that Trump and the US are highly volatile and unreliable people unlikely to honor any agreement they make. That doesn't mean we should make our negotiating team's job harder by intentionally poking the wasp nest.
And no, provinces generally don't have jurisdiction over foreign policy like trade agreements. That is a federal power, hence why its "CUSMA" (Canada-US-Mexico Agreement) not "BCASM...NFUSMA". Provinces generally do not set their own foreign policy, and having emotions about Trump, the US, and threats to our sovereignty shouldn't change that. At best provinces are allowed to make their own deals within the confines of existing frameworks set up by the federal government(s).
There is no concrete win from Wab totally owning MAGAts other than a cheap political stunt for Canadian audiences, and a concrete downside. See: Ford's infamous Reagan ad and the fallout from that.
So you recognise that the US is unlikely to honor a deal, yet in the same breath ask not complicate negotiating the deal?
If the deal is a sham, why put any stock in it? Standing up for ourselves will only put us in a stronger postion down the road if the US ever becomes rational again. We'll be just sitting there on the next administrations doorstep, with easy economic opportunity a signature away (and a list of demands).
Making a deal now is a fools errand. All Carney has to do is stem the bleeding to keep us afloat until then.
I think people here don't understand that I'm not advocating for capitulation. I'm saying "let the negotiation team manage the negotiations", including deciding what pressures we're applying and what we're not willing to concede.
This is the political equivalent of going to buy a used car or something and bringing your kid along and the kid starts begging to buy the car. Wab and Ford are not party to these negotiations, and should not be undermining federal government's negotiations.
"It might rain later and ruin my sign I created for the parade later. No one really can predict the rain. I should piss on my sign because it doesn't really matter anyways."
A thoughtful approach to foreign policy.
It is within provincial jurisdiction - https://www.canada.ca/en/intergovernmental-affairs/services/internal-trade/canadian-free-trade-agreement.html
The CFTA aligns provinces with things like USMCA, but per my point, it’s being violated by Trump and some provinces are retaliating in ways that are still compatible with those agreements and are speaking up about it. As is their right.
Bud, what are you talking about? Per your own link:
This is a trade agreement between provinces and has nothing to do with foreign policy. Per the CFTA, Article 100 (Objective) and Article 101:
I'm wondering if you even read your own source? It's free and online: https://www.cfta-alec.ca/cfta-agreement/chapter-one-initial-provisions
I'm actually losing my mind that you all are allowed to vote. I hope our nation increases our education budget for Canadian civics classes.
Constitution Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-4.html
Then, when Canada legally became distinct from the Empire, "The Parliament and Government of Canada" referenced here became the new, national government via the Statute of Westminster, and the jurisdiction for international Treaties and trade agreements was inherited by the federal government.
Read about it here: https://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/prb0004-e.htm#A.%C2%A0Authority%20Respecting%20International%20Treaties(txt)
You people are so confidently wrong. Your downvotes mean nothing to me - I've seen what you upvote.
Fuck your "you people" superior bullshit. Like it or not we are all in the same melting pot together and different thoughts and ideas abound. The goal is to tighten up relationships and find common ground, not be disdainful/hateful. You cut yourself off from the herd just like an orange felon I know. Is that superiority? I may be wrong, but I'm confident about it. /s
"I'm wrong and proud!" is the most American thing I can think of. Enjoy.
"Wrong" and "Proud" transcend nationalism but I am having a joyful day regardless.
Like, have you ever heard of Manitoba (or any other province) setting import tariffs on US/foreign goods? No. When you import a good into Canada, does Manitoba CBSA charge you import fees? Do provinces even have their own CBSA? It is demonstrably false that provinces can set foreign trade policy without federal involvement and frameworks. They cannot tariff, set quotas, or even lower tariffs or import fees. They can buy and sell with foreign entities but only from within the confines of federal agreements like CUSMA, which is negotiated federally. Provinces can direct Crown Crops like liquor commissions to not buy goods made available via CUSMA, but they cannot change the terms of CUSMA to allow new goods, change import tariffs and fees, etc.