Maybe it's a good idea to listen to someone who publishes papers on this very subject, and is a professor of both philosophy and psychiatry and directs an Institute for Cognitive Science. That person is Dr. Chandra Sripada and his insights are fascinating.

Sean Carroll (interviewer, scientist and science communicator) says this interview made him lean towards the answer being "yes, they think like humans" whereas previously he favored the opposite view.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We have no idea how consciousness works

Misleading.

We have many very plausible, evidence-driven models of how consciousness works: global workspace, CTM (Conscious Turing Machine), IIT, ... the problem is figuring out which have the best predictive power. And that problem is being very actively worked.

and also we have no idea how LLMs work

Patently false. Look up "mechanistic interpretability", CLiP, etc.

There is very much a back and forth synergy right now between the communities of researchers interpreting neural network activations, and biological brain patterns.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We have many very plausible, evidence-driven models

"Plausible" counts for jack shit in science.

There are many models because there's no convincing evidence for any of them.

the problem is figuring out which have the best predictive power. And that problem is being very actively worked.

Yes, these models have no experimental or "predictive" use even after decades of "research".