this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
157 points (98.2% liked)
Wholesome
4427 readers
394 users here now
We’re here to help you have a better day! For all wholesome and heartwarming content including memes, news stories, etc.
We chose Reddthat specifically because no downvotes are allowed. Negative comments will be removed.
Please see our twinned community for more wholesome joy...
!dadforaminute@lemmy.world !superbowl@lemmy.world
Rules:
- Be wholesome. Trolling, passive aggressive, nasty comments aren't allowed.
- No politics. It's not wholesome.
- Don't hate on ANY groups. Racist, transphobic, ableist etc comments aren't allowed.
Positive Communities of Lemmy:
- !goodnewseveryone@piefed.social
- !motivationalmemes@reddthat.com
- !OptimistsUnite@reddthat.com
- !positivity@lemmy.today
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Didn’t read the article?
This is about some randos that made photos for a specific Wikipedia entry, and less about “look at how wholesome Wikipedia is!” Which makes your comment just kinda… odd.
Their actions are shit, but it’s only tangentially about Wikipedia to begin with.
ok but seeing wikipedia under c/wholesome under the current circumstances seemed like astroturfing to me
just because the title calls it "Wikipedia's [photo]" doesn't mean it was organized by Wikipedia
two people (three if you read the article) of their own accord uploaded the photos to Wikipedia
the title could also say "the people that are mildly famous because of a photo they uploaded to Wikipedia..." but that's unnecessarily verbose
Actually, seeing this article made me yearn for the internet that existed without billionaire influence. It motivated me to participate more on Lemmy, because that's how we get it back.