this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
67 points (95.9% liked)

Open Source

48618 readers
162 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federated internet archive, I'm wondering whether I should build it myself. With so many journalists being banned for reporting the gaza genocide we need more ways to combat censorship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PumpkinDrama@reddthat.com 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A federated internet archive, I'm wondering whether I should build it myself. With so many journalists being banned for reporting the gaza genocide we need more ways to combat censorship.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I know lots of people are crypto-reactionaries... But there are like dozens of these projects in the (primarily open source) crypto space. The basic idea seems to be that a crypto-archive uses a blockchain for hosting and a cryptocurrency to fund it. I don't know how successful these projects have been. Here are a few quick examples from a search:

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Using a blockchain to store any data beyond a little bit of text e.g. images and videos(hence why NFTs are stored as links to where an image was hosted, rather than the data of the image file itself living on the blockchain) is just incredibly inefficient and impractical however you slice it

A PeerTube like architecture would be far better(faster etc)

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Yes blockchain is an horible database design for efficiency. If it's decentralised, open and permissionless, if not you just don't need a blockchain.

But it's good at immutability.

[–] kazerniel@piefed.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My main concern would be how to prevent tampering with archived pages - the owner of the second most popular site after Wayback Machine, archive.is, has been known to modify the content of archived pages for petty personal reasons. And without the sanctity of archives, the whole exercise loses its value as proof of records of the past.

[–] morto@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

maybe that would be a rare case of some blockchain-like structure being actually useful? But without any kind of tokenization, of course

[–] kazerniel@piefed.world 2 points 6 days ago

yeah this may be an actual use case