this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
174 points (100.0% liked)
Firefox
22946 readers
10 users here now
/c/firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
Rules
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
Reporting
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
....and therefore my main browser. It's cool that competitors are handing Firefox a unique selling point.
And sad that, even so, Firefox has been a rounding error in global usage data. π’
I've been using Firefox since it existed, never been disappointed. I just hope that it (or Mozilla) didn't eventually go bankrupt and dies. You can say what you want about the politics and financing of Mozilla but we desperately need them to prevail.
Same, very rarely "disappointed" with FF outside of the core browser (like the days when Chrome could point to how much RAM older FF was stuck using before Chrome became worse). Still used it as default on desktop and laptop since like 03~04, and completely switched on Android when they started allowing limited extensions (and now can basically force almost all).
The sites themselves are what I actually feel extremely disappointed about. Back when I did randomly buy/stream songs/albums from Amazon it would work. But now they pretend to work and then act like my browser "is out of date" (even link the FF site knowing there isn't an update and pulls the old IE tactic of really pushing "better with Chrome" or whatever). I don't use the Netflix site, but know that they have intentionally dark patterned using it on FF with fake limits on being 720p, and very much can run 1080p with third-party extensions likely spoofing Chrome/Chromium coded DRM (I am guessing that is what is being done at least).
Companies are even worse. My girlfriend's boyfriend was trying to buy train ticket from Deutsche Bahn, and they're just were none available. It was baffling. He asked me to check (because he was in a hotel room) and I, too, could not find any.
Turns out, they refuse to sell tickets to customers that use Linux!!?! Change the OS in your browser ID string, and magically all sorts of tickets appear!
Like wtf, how purposefully evil do you have to be to run a business like that? What is even the point?
Same here. I also can count on one hand the occasions where a site was broken in FF but worked in Chromium. And for a majority of those, that was intentional (aka no actual issue, switchtig the user-agent "fixed" the site). So I have little understanding when people say they can't use Firefox because pages break.
To be fair, changing your browser agent is on the technical side of things, in my opinion this goes beyond "refilling washer fluid in your car" but more like swapping out the licence plate light for a different colour - few people realise that's even a thing you can do, and that it has any effect.
Moreover, users should not be blamed when it's clearly the other party who's being willfully obstructionist. But I understand your sentiment. It's tiresome, right?
No, absolutely with you on this! I didn't mean that I don't understand because you can simply change the string (because agreed, most people don't know and can't be expected to know about this).
What I meant is: in 20 years of FF usage, I have come across ~5-10 broken sites (legitimate or UA, doesn't matter).
So I can't understand when people say they can't use FF because it breaks so many sites.
Just my personal opinions (ranting) without hard data/facts: Which is basically back to the same issue from the IE days. Chromium is better than IE really because it can be used to make other browsers. But is being coded for by sites like IE in how if the agent seen is not Chromium then it hard stops. Which to me just makes the circular feedback that Chromium IS the standard because more people use it, but people use it because non-Chromium browsers "can't" load the pages they go to. Same applies to extensions being gutted because Google controls basically what gets to still work, and most Chromium browsers don't host their own extensions stores. Given most people don't bother trying other browsers because Edge is the default in Windows (so Chromium) or because a long time ago they were told "don't use IE and use Chrome" by their "tech friends" when IE was getting worse and worse with malware exploits. Younger folks have grown up with Chrome being "the internet" like IE was for folks in the 90s/00s.
A lot of the folks that do intentionally install Chromium "forks" do it for some misc features/layouts while being told sites that work in Chrome will also work. So those folks at least are interested in trying stuff like Brave/Opera/OperaGX after a YouTuber or some source they trust. But would only try FF or browsers based on it if those same trusted sources went hard pushing it, and if major sites they use (that currently artificially don't work) did work. The moment one site they use enough doesn't work, then they basically swear off FF and maybe even continue the telephone game of telling their friends/family FF is bad/won't work. Then the sites continue to code for Chromium because "no one uses FF (or whatever non-Chromium browsers that aren't Safari).
same here and it became bad enough to force me to install an extension to switch the user agent dynamically.
goes to prove the depths of the lack of technical illiteracy that the western world has been shepherded into.