Science Fiction

19482 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

A timeline problem in For all mankind (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 month ago by thiscat@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

as someone who's looked into FAM and is interested about Spaceflight history and proposals i have a lot of confusion about some things one of them is the timeline according to the show Jamestown had landed in 1973 and it's implied to be after apollo-20 however it doesnt make sense since NASA can do two lunar missions per year even if they got infinite budget it will take at least until 1975 until they would get Jamestown worked out and launched Apollo 11-20 were already schedualed and if even if apollo-20 launches in 1973 it still means that NASA needs to test new technologies like the LSAM life support a new version of the CSM built for extended missions like i dont get it why make an alternate reality show about spaceflight and get all the historical and scientific things wrong you are pushing the greatest most devoted audience you can have

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Operating in the dark is another case of "very difficult, not impossible." RTGs were invented in 1954, so portable nuclear power is absolutely an option they could and would have used.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Its the manned part, cant really build the ships that well or they’re too heavy to lift off or something along those lines.