this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
401 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31051 readers
2157 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump’s endorsement wasn’t enough to power Mike Lindell to the Republican nomination for governor in Minnesota. The former MyPillow CEO is projected to lose to Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth in Tuesday’s Republican primary.

Lindell is a conspiracy theorist and strong supporter of Trump and his outlandish claims that voter fraud corrupted the 2020 presidential election. His advocacy made him a target for a series of defamation lawsuits but won Trump’s support.

“Mike Lindell deserves a BIG WIN IN MINNESOTA today,” Trump said Tuesday on his Truth Social platform. “Nobody has worked harder, and given up so much, in fighting for free and fair Elections.”

Though he had support from the national leader of the Republican Party, Minnesota Republicans wanted someone else to be their standard-bearer in the governor’s race, endorsing health care industry executive Kendall Qualls.

Minnesota Republican Party chairman Alex Plechash said Minnesota Republicans were surprised when Trump endorsed Lindell in July.

“We strongly support the President and his agenda, but Minnesota Republicans must choose the candidate best positioned to defeat Amy Klobuchar,” Plechash said in a statement last month

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The numbers:

The Associated Press called the race for Demuth at 11:26 p.m. ET as the state speaker had secured 43.6% of the 93% of the votes counted.

Lindell, who was backed by President Donald Trump, came a distant second with 32.3%% of the votes.

Kendall Qualls, a former healthcare executive who has backed the Minnesota GOP, placed third with 21.4% of the vote.

Klobuchar won the Democratic primary with 89.6% of the votes, and polls show her with a wide lead in the general election.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Right around 32% of americans are truly disconnected from reality and fucked in the head.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago

It's actually a bit better. Minnesota does have open primaries, but you can only pick 1 to vote in per primary.

So only 32% of people that chose to vote in the republican primary.

Roughly 685,000 people voted in the democratic primary while only 413,000 people voted in the Republican primary.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Based on those results, I put the figure at 53.7%

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, the guy did figure out how to make a pillow Nazi propaganda.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Both options suck ass. A healthcare executive is absolutely someone * wouldn't want in government.

Good thing it's Minnesota, so neither had a chance anyhow.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Earlier there had been worries of Minnesota going purple, but I suspect ICE really hindered that

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. Voting always seems to tell us a number around there actually.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

that's actually an alarming number of votes...