this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
557 points (97.6% liked)

memes

22228 readers
2916 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but the customer isn’t paying the tariff. The customer is just paying more for a product. The business is paying the tariff.

It’s a “technically correct” thing, sure, but it’s why customers aren’t owed the refund. Businesses can increase prices whenever they want.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

That would be fine and dandy if tariffs were only for frivolous purchases. Things you could do without. But they weren't. We were FORCED to pay higher prices for thing we NEED due to companies raising the prices due to illegal Republican tariffs.

We were robbed. Again. Period.

And anyone who was robbed deserves compensation.

[–] ab60753@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I get what you mean, i think my point is more regarding who the sufferinf party is.

The customer is the end "sufferer". So should have the repirations. This is a wierd metaphot but hear me out. Lets say someone tries to shoot me. I dodge it and someone behinds me gets shot. A judge ordera the shooter to pay for the medical bills. Would it be fair for me to get that money? Or should it go to the person who got shot? Yes maybe i deserve some compensation. But compleatly ignoring the person who got shot feels wrong no?

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The person didn’t choose to get shot though, while you still chose to buy the product at the higher price. That’s the difference.

Why the price went up makes no difference to you as the customer.

I get that it sucks that prices went up because of an illegal tariff, but the customer didn’t pay the tariff so they’re not entitled to a refund. The tariff was paid before you bought the product, by the business. The best you can hope for is that prices will go down, but unfortunately that’s unlikely.