this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
33 points (97.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49223 readers
781 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello everyone, and sorry for my bad english. So lets start with a usual topic about Open Source, and that is "everybody can see the code of a OpenSource programm to see if it is malware". And my question is: how people that cannot read a single line of a programming language manage to do that? I mean, they can just trust in everybody that say which software is secure or not. If the software is a virus or malware, or poses security risks, people won't know that unless they're programmers, and so the same thing happens to these kinds of people as used to happen with proprietary software: they have to rely on those who “know” to find out if something. I find this quite problematic because, as I said, anyone who doesn't understand the code wouldn't be able to verify whether such a program is secure or not, and would have to place their trust in third parties. That aside, it's also worth noting that most software has hundreds, if not thousands, of lines of code, which would make it take longer to parse all that code—and even more tedious than reading a typical "EULA." Can you think of any way to fix this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maxihuenu@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

yeah i use floss software for that too! but maybe somethere is a malicious code hidden by a very good programmer (or a group of these) in critical software...

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

For a good case study: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor

If this had been closed source, the attacker would not have been able to use the technique to commit the changes in the first place.

However, if they HAD snuck the changes in, nobody would have caught them, and only the developer would have been able to identify something was wrong before full deployment.

But we should all assume that while the xz trojan never made it out, others likely have, both in open and closed source.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

If this had been closed source, the attacker would not have been able to use the technique to commit the changes in the first place.

No need for speculation we have such a real equivalent.

The SolarWinds Cyberattack Explained: Hack, Victims, and Key Facts

Both are supply chain attacks and the proprietary world let it go farther. They both highlight vulnerabilities. There are going to be small and important FOSS projects that have burnt out maintainers, and possibly few eyes on. In principal someone should be getting paid to keep things safe in closed land, but security is a cost center and an easy cut for the MBAs in charge of things.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It is always possible. The point is that while open source software doesn't solve this problem, it gives you a non-zero chance of someone detecting it and raising the alarm. Non-zero may be large or may be small, it is probably never 100% chance, but large non-zero is very good, and even small non-zero it is much better than the 0% detection chance that closed source offers.

[–] maxihuenu@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Sorry but i dont understand what do you mean with "non-zero"