this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
510 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

17031 readers
1602 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In common usage, the "____ class" terms refer to income/wealth levels, and the social constructs derive from that.

More importantly, the semantics of the comment are completely irrelevant to the actual message being conveyed.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We all belong to any number of different overlapping classes when considered through different paradigms. My point here was that talking about the "middle class" as though it had a place in political class theory is confusing categories. There is nothing between the ruling class and the working class and I don't know how to put that simpler. Those are the classes we are concerned about when discussing work reform. Political classes aren't about our income or whether we prefer Evian or Fiji.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Good lord, replace the words "middle class" with whatever you want to use to describe "population group that can use one income to support buying a home, having a spouse and 2.1 children, and saving enough to retire at 65".

The point is the massive increase in top level pay, not whatever term you are using to refer to the rest.