this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
289 points (99.7% liked)

Linux Gaming

23272 readers
8 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I don't know what they could put on the table except for something like Big Picture, which is not nearly as fleshed out on Heroic.

And even then, Big Picture is already available for most gamers, because Steam is already installed.

I think it would've been a better use of resources to just officially support Heroic. GOG support exists because of their open distribution system. So why make use of that software?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Idk, some user here who otherwise is supremely anti-corporation, anti-DRM and anti-closed source said they absolutely can NOT use GOG over Steam because there's no native Linux client. Apparently that's a complete showstopper for some people, despite the existence of Heroic and many other tools you could use. "The games just don't work"

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Heroic is ultimately outside of GOG's sphere of influence. If you decide to officially lean on them and they decide to drop GOG or Herioc development entirely they'd have to scramble for a replacement.

And honestly I only use Herioc to interface with GOG, i'd probably prefer use the official application if there was any.

[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah I get from a user's perspective why they would like an official client. But I personally don't believe it would attract enough new users to make maintaining a Linux version worthwhile from the firms perspective. ~~Especially managing game compatibility on Linux seems like a nightmare.~~ (I take this back, I was thinking about it and I haven't had any issues with Proton for a while now.) But hey, their board probably already weighted this out before making the decision so I might just be underestimating the crowd it would attract

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Linux gaming has been in the lift for a good while now is getting increasingly difficult write off as insignificant, I'm not sure the intent here is to attract users as much as to just service those the made the switch.

Could also be long game. Ideally this keeps growing and everyone (including the anti-cheat developers that are the sole reason some games still don't work) are giong to have to take this seriously.

And we don't know how much actual additional work there is here, it could be relatively trivial to get the client working on Linux.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Heroic exists independently of GOG, which limits them to the decision of an independent developer. Essentially, they are at the mercy of Heroic dev to support GOG.

Porting their own application ensures they maintain control over software stack and also get improved security.

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Activities. My "friends" can’t see what and how much I play. My only entry there is from testing Amazon Luna.

[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago