this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
265 points (99.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

23260 readers
151 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 4 hours ago

they've been working on a Linux client for, what, 10 years? I'll believe it if it happens.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A really dumb question from a non-gamer. If I were to buy a game from GOG. Say Doom, can I simply run the Windows installer with bottles? I have no interest in "modern" games and I seldom play, but I have a taste for the occasional trip down memory lane.

I do use a couple of windows programs in bottles without issue, (Bambubuddy and Meshmixer), but I don't know jack all about buying games.

[–] alfredon996@feddit.it 1 points 3 hours ago

Of course you can

[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't know what they could put on the table except for something like Big Picture, which is not nearly as fleshed out on Heroic.

And even then, Big Picture is already available for most gamers, because Steam is already installed.

I think it would've been a better use of resources to just officially support Heroic. GOG support exists because of their open distribution system. So why make use of that software?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Idk, some user here who otherwise is supremely anti-corporation, anti-DRM and anti-closed source said they absolutely can NOT use GOG over Steam because there's no native Linux client. Apparently that's a complete showstopper for some people, despite the existence of Heroic and many other tools you could use. "The games just don't work"

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Heroic is ultimately outside of GOG's sphere of influence. If you decide to officially lean on them and they decide to drop GOG or Herioc development entirely they'd have to scramble for a replacement.

And honestly I only use Herioc to interface with GOG, i'd probably prefer use the official application if there was any.

[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah I get from a user's perspective why they would like an official client. But I personally don't believe it would attract enough new users to make maintaining a Linux version worthwhile from the firms perspective. ~~Especially managing game compatibility on Linux seems like a nightmare.~~ (I take this back, I was thinking about it and I haven't had any issues with Proton for a while now.) But hey, their board probably already weighted this out before making the decision so I might just be underestimating the crowd it would attract

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago

Heroic exists independently of GOG, which limits them to the decision of an independent developer. Essentially, they are at the mercy of Heroic dev to support GOG.

Porting their own application ensures they maintain control over software stack and also get improved security.

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Activities. My "friends" can’t see what and how much I play. My only entry there is from testing Amazon Luna.

[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 1 points 7 hours ago

That's fair

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Amazing, it only took them about a decade from it being the most voted for feature of all time until they started working on it. That gives me great confidence that they'll treat us Linux users like first class citizens /s

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This new effort started when the new CEO bought back a majority of shares. He was one of the original owners. Back then their Linux efforts were also better.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yeah I've seen much more active development in GOG since he took over. I mean GOG left the beta phase after years.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

That's interesting, I might give it more credibility then, but I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, come on. They are right about the DRM, I can give them the benefit of the doubt.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm glad they're doing it, but I'll believe it when I see it. This seems like a marketing thing more than anything else, like most things GoG does. Which brings me to:

They are right about the DRM

Except they don't believe that themselves: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/drm_on_gog_list_of_singleplayer_games_with_drm/page1

Plus, if you disconsider the whole "having to use Steam to download binaries is a form of DRM", AFAIK the same games that are DRM free on GoG are DRM free on Steam.

I'm all in favor of no DRM in games, but being able to play the games on my OS of choice is miles more important than them being DRM-free, because I honestly don't care about the DRM status of a binary I can't use. So I'd rather keep giving money to the company that's investing in making me able to play games. I used to buy games from GoG back before Proton and DXVK, but those projects made Steam so much more attractive for Linux users that it is not even a contest.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That poster's opinion of what is DRM is... interesting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Year of the Linux desktop year

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's already year of linux on everything else from mobile devices, VR (meta quest) to servers.

I don't think its year of the linux desktop, but, as people try to become more independent, there will certainly be a push. Countries like China in the government already apparently use Linux

And, there is hopefully a bigger push for SteamOS based gaming handheld consoles. GOG integration with SteamOS would be awesome too

[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

You know why we say it every year? Because every year is the year of the Linux desktop

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Games are one thing that keeps people stuck on Windows so more games on Linux, either native or through API emulation, does potentially allow more people to consider the switch.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's often also professional software such as Photoshop or AutoCAD that keep them on Windows. Programs they use a lot all day for work.

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago

I would say that it's often not the same computer.

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

GOG Galaxy is like Steam but for GOG games, in case anyone else was wondering.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it also has integrations for some other things too, so you can use it to launch all your games from various launchers instead of remembering which games are on which launchers and opening each one to search for the game you want to play. It centralized your games into one spot which can be nice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Its a bit better than that, its a bit closer to an all in one launcher ~~/downloader~~ client for all your games from (steam)/gog/epic/etc

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think Heroic basically already does that though

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

It does. More options aren't bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now if they would stop being so selective about what they allow on their platform. There is a wide array of popular games available on Steam and DRM-free on Itch but for some reason they aren't available on GOG.

I get that some people have been loudly calling for curation on Steam, but curation is a terrible thing. The customer should be the one to decide what they buy (provided the developer isn't mass-producing asset flips). If they want a middle-ground they can just not promote any unendorsed games.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 6 hours ago

But letting anyone in is also a security risk. Steam has the capacity to check everything, and still some virus and other pass on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Runecrush376@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Great news. I hope they add linux native achievements , or cloud saves to linux native versions too.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I believe thatbis the point of GOG Galaxy, otherwise you can just use the native installers.

Hopefully they add Wine/Proton integration like Steam and Heroic have.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (11 children)

will it have ss symbols too?

[–] warm@kbin.earth 18 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Only occasionally and they will say 'sorry'.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Will it too be 100x heavier than needed?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

And completely redundant because there are already FOSS game managers that support GoG they could contribute to?

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 8 points 1 day ago

It’s about damn time.

load more comments
view more: next ›