this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
500 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86780 readers
3370 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Prosecuted for what, exactly? If push comes to shove, it's a fifth amendment issue.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I haven't searched yet, but I'm curious if this is the first time that someone's being prosecuted for this. Authorities can detain a US Citizen and confiscate their electronic devices for forensic analysis, which should be a violations of the 5th, but the SCotUS feels differently.

If this is the first time a US Citizen has been prosecuted for refusing to unlock and handover their personal devices, then I'd wager that the authorities want to make this into a test case, and appeal it all the way to the SCotUS to rule that such a seizure and prosecution is not unconstitutional, or required for national security, or some other authoritarian bull.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Prosecuted for what, exactly?

For not being nice to the gestapo?

not if they judge shop