this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
458 points (98.3% liked)

politics

30584 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s campaign strategist for his 2016 election win says: “I believe we will have a national emergency declared by late August,” ahead of the Congressional midterm elections due on November 3. “You will have enough evidence by mid-August to show that we have a massive problem” of election fraud, he tells me in an interview. Trump’s televised address to the nation on Thursday last week was the beginning of the process, he says.

The president declassified documents, which he claimed show “shocking vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure” revealed by the 2020 election.

These had been hidden, even from him, by a “deep state” conspiracy of US intelligence services, he posited.

Trump demanded that the Congress pass a bill called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, or SAVE, Act. The bill stipulates that all voters produce a passport or birth certificate to be eligible to vote. Democrats denounce it as an effort at mass disenfranchisement. The Brennan Centre for Justice at New York University estimates that it could block 21 million Americans from the ballot box.

Under the US Constitution, it’s the states, not the federal government, that run elections. The SAVE Act would force state governments to hand voter roll information to Washington.

Trump sent his Homeland Security Secretary, Markwayne Mullin, out the following morning to issue a threat to state officials: they could face prison time unless they followed the administration’s orders to remove non-citizens from rolls.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Elections are done by the states, as clearly outlined in the Constitution. If Red states want to opt out, they're welcome to do that, but the Blue states (and most Red ones) are going to have their elections anyway, and they will count.

All the rest of it is just smoke.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The point is to force an constitutional crisis to allow the Supreme Court to rubber stamp the coup.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Supreme Court has been fairly unpredictable, which is a problem for Trump, but the bigger problem is that they've been VERY predictable when it comes to a direct challenge to the Constitution. It's one thing when it's an interpretation of the an amendment, it's another thing when it's a downright challenge, like Birthright Citizenship.

I doubt the Supreme Court is going to just ignore the 22md Amendment.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well Ol' Lumpty Trumpty just declared that he plans on running again. Setting aside the delusions of a President who's brain is rotting away.

The way I see is that a red state not participating or a purple/blue state with very incredible baseless claims of fraud is what going to kick off the crisis.

First scenario, a red state or states don't participate. A red state or a coalition of red states file a claim saying that you can't have an election without us as our electoral votes were never assigned to a Presidential candidate. If there is no election, then the President Mush For Brains is still President pending a proper election.

Second scenario, a blue state or states or purple state is accused of having massive fraud in their elections. Once again, the baseless fraud claims end up in the Supreme Court with the same issue as the first scenario with a twist. Republicans will say that we can't trust these election results therefore the election is invalid. If the election is invalid, President Mush is still President.

One of the goals of the Republicans is to run out the clock such as what happened in the 2000 Florida Recount and the Brooks Brothers riot.

As far as I am aware, the US Constitution is silent on what happens when election chicanery at this scale happens.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

The Constitution is very clear that the President's term is four years, and he can only have two. If there isn't someone to take over on Inauguration Day, then Trump's term ends anyway, and NOBODY holds the office.

We hear a lot about a Constitutional Crisis, but that is what a real one looks like.

If Trump tries to stay under those circumstances, then it's the end of American Democracy, and the problems will increase exponentially. A big one will be April 15, when many Americans will refuse to file their taxes.

If this scenario happens (it won't), go into work the next day, and book a meeting with HR to remove all your tax deductions from your paycheck, so you pay as little income tax as possible. Then only file if you have a refund coming.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Also, they will never allow anything that takes away their own power. Even in their blanket presidential immunity ruling they reserved for themselves the power to decide what counts as an official act.

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The constitution is worth less than toilet paper without a Congress and a Supreme Court to uphold it.