Anti Landlords

279 readers

1 users here now

Post anything rental / housing crisis related / just complain about your slumlord/landlord

Interesting:

georgist idea of land tax

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Kokomheart@lemmy.ca

455

After refusing a $287 repair bill, Portland renter beats his landlord in court, wins $32K verdict (www.yahoo.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/antilandlords@lemmy.ca

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The clash began after Spring refused to pay a $287 electrician's bill that his landlord forwarded him for the repair of a burnt-out socket in his unit. Shortly after, the landlord notified Spring that his rent would increase by $100 per month.

The jury awarded Spring $16,000 — an amount that Oregon law doubles to $32,000 because of the nature of the violation. On top of that, Spring's attorneys also are entitled to ask a judge to order the landlord to pay all of Spring's legal fees, an amount that currently stands at $225,000.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Many (all?) states award attorneys fees as a matter of law for specific claims. In my state, most of our tenent protection laws award tenents attorneys fees automatically if they win (along with triple damages).

Private contracts also frequently include a loser pays provision.

Additionally courts can, under their own authority, award attorneys fees if one sides does something to drag out and increase the cost of litigation; which is almost certainly how this dispute got so expensive.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

For specific violations yes. We don't know what they are or how a 32k judgement that would be small claims ended up on circuit court with 230k of legal fees.