this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
16 points (86.4% liked)
Explain Like I'm Five
22424 readers
9 users here now
Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is this like the booked Attached? There’s Secure, Anxious, and Avoidant.
To put it basically:
Secure - someone who is secure in their feelings. They don’t usually second guess others and what they say. If someone’s wife says she has to work late tonight, they accept what that person says at face value.
Anxious - someone who deals with a lot of anxious feelings and responds to those feelings with behaviors. Like in the previous example, if someone’s wife says she has to work late, the anxious type of person may second guess this and their mind jumps to immediately thinking their wife is cheating on them. One of the behaviors they may exhibit is to now play games to test this like sending passive aggressive texts to get their wife’s attention back on them and help them reassure their feelings. They may do something like text “Okay, make sure to take a shower before coming home tonight. I don’t want his scent in our bed.”
Avoidant - someone who is more avoidant in how they interact with others. They usually are more likely to want space from others. This person may get annoyed with a partner who is seeking for reassurance. There was an example in the book of a man and his wife who were part of a game show. His wife was anxious and constantly wanting him to hold her hand. He, the avoidant type, preferred to not do this as he felt this was dumb to keep having to hold her hand and they should just focus on the games instead.
That is to say, you may have anxious or avoidant feelings inside, but the secure type is someone who manages them in a preferable way. They may have feelings about their wife staying longer at the office, but they will be more likely to address it appropriately with their partner and be calm and rational instead of being passive aggressive about it. The secure type is also one who can understand that something like holding their partner’s hand may be silly, but it’s what this person needs in this moment and it’s how they want to support their partner.
Edit: forgot to expand on the way it goes. The book addresses this and it says that scientists still aren’t sure how these develop. There are theories, but nothing definitive.
It all goes hand in hand with the “nature vs nurture” discussion in psychology. This tries to investigate whether you develop your personality traits because your parents were that way or is it because you developed it from your environment growing up? I remember my psychology textbook going over twins separated at birth and this being one of the most interesting cases for this. Even though they didn’t grow up together in the same environment, they still had very similar mannerisms into adulthood, things we would assume would develop as they grow up because of how their parents raised them.
It’s the same with attachments. It’s not entirely clear whether someone developed them from childhood environments or from biology.
As someone with general anxiety disorder, I am surprised to realize I have the secure attachment style despite this.
On another note: that fact about separated twins is interesting. I am going to have to really look into it. Any books you would recommend?
That is fascinating, but at the same time it shouldn’t be and you should be proud to be that way. I was all over the place when writing my original comment, so forgive how I wrote some of the things I wrote. But essentially what separates a secure and anxious type of person isn’t that a secure person never has thoughts and feelings like that, but it’s in the way they go about navigating their various relationships (familial, romantic, platonic, work, etc.). So in my example, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with feeling doubtful and a little uncertain that your wife suddenly says she has to work late tonight and you feeling like there’s a possibility that she’s cheating, but a secure type will navigate those feelings more rationality than an anxious type who will blow up and act out over it. The secure type will address their concerns in a more calm and relaxed manner despite the fact they may have those feelings. Some secure people don’t have those feelings at all and just take it at face value. Honestly, good on you for being the secure type!
As for books…it’s been a while, so I’ve been going solely off memory from back in college. My college textbook is where I read most of this on so if I were to give a recommendation, it would be that lol. I’m sure there are books others can recommend. I’d say check up on any materials that have to do with the topic of “nature vs nurture” and they will most likely go into more detail about the phenomenon of twins and how alike they can be.
I know a lot about this attachment stuff only because I recently was recommended it by someone I was dating. I read the book “Attached” by Amir Levine & Rachel S. F. Heller. I don’t remember them going into any details about the topic of twins and going deep into nature vs nurture, though. The book has a quiz to help you find out what attachment type you might be.
The person I dated was a secure type with a little bit of anxious. I’m mostly anxious with a little secure. But the book has been helping me understand it and find better ways to become more secure.
Thank you.
I feel like it is important to tag onto the top comment and note: anyone reading this does not "have" an attachment style. The way you interact with others will change based on the day of the week and what you ate for breakfast. There is no anxious-attachment neurotransmitter, nor an avoidant-attachment brain region. They are not switches we can flip on and off, nor boxes we can neatly categorize people into. In fact, the boxes themselves are made up, and could have been described in any number of other ways, had the original researchers thought about things differently at the time.
You’re right and I’m actually editing my comment right now to be more clear about this. I feel I wasn’t as clear as I’d like to be in describing these types.