this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)
Linux Questions
4042 readers
6 users here now
Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)
- stay on topic
- be nice (no name calling)
- do not post long blocks of text such as logs
- do not delete your posts
- only post questions (no information posts)
Tips for giving and receiving help
- be as clear and specific
- say thank you if a solution works
- verify your solutions before posting them as facts.
Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/movies/
This isn't strictly necessary. My movies library is a mix of both loose files and folders and works just fine.
As your library grows, or becomes more complex, or contains anything that's difficult to differentiate, Jellyfin will struggle to properly identify.
With well-named folders (release date, imdbid), my Jellyfin server still has issues where it will mis-identify some things that arent mainstream. Old movies are specifically problematic, as are rare titles that have any similarity to something more popular.
Using the folder naming structure reduced mis-identification tremendously.
Well, yes, but you can get exactly the same result by having well-named files as well. Having them well-named in general makes identification more reliable, regardless of whether it's the full path or just the filename.
Protip: find the tvdb/omdb ID and stick it in the name if having issues still (see docs)