this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
459 points (97.7% liked)

Brand New Sentence

346 readers
524 users here now

Showcasing the brazen and nouveau in English communication.

  1. Be cool to each other and follow the lemmy.today instance rules.
  2. Post title must be the sentence or relevant portion of the sentence if it's very long.
  3. Link for context if possible.
  4. Tag NSFW where applicable.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's literally no difference in the usage.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Context is the difference. If you're one of the people who can't understand hyperbole and saracsm and such, you'll just have to take my word for it I guess.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you’re one of the people who can’t understand hyperbole and saracsm and such

I understand it just fine.

The problem is that the word "literally" is supposed to mean "without hyperbole or sarcasm". So when you use it to emphasize hyperbole or sarcasm, you're making the word meaningless.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

the word “literally” is supposed to mean “without hyperbole or sarcasm”

According to what objective standard? Good luck finding one outside of maaaybe special-use technical jargon. Here's the literal dictionary's take on it, if you'd prefer to go that direction with the conversation.

Words mean what their speakers fluently use them to mean - anything else is just linguistic snobbery masquerading as concern.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

There's literally no difference in context between those two examples. You're literally just making up the rules.