this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
160 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

86217 readers
2516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

No one who wants to boot into multiple OS’s should want to have them on the same physical drive. That’s complete idiocy. Zero redundancy, lose all of them if the drive dies.

New OS, new disk. Every time.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 22 hours ago

I'm glad that you have extra income to buy drive per OS to insert into your PC, but there are these things that are called laptops, and sometimes people have them, and sometimes they have quite old ones and non-extensible ones and you get where I'm going with this?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No one [...] should want

The moment you've written those words, you've already lost. Because they obviously do want it, and operating systems have supported it for decades, which means it's perfectly reasonable for people to expect it to continue.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

MacOS doesn’t. Windows doesn’t. The only one that does is Linux, the one that no one in the grand scheme of things wants to use.

There are multitudes of ways to use Linux on windows machines already. You can’t install windows onto a machine that already has an OS installed no doubt got a multitude of security reasons.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

MacOS doesn’t.

Anymore.

Windows doesn’t.

Anymore.

The only one that does is Linux, the one that no one in the grand scheme of things wants to use.

So you think making it harder to use is the right path for greater adoption? Bold strategy.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not making it harder to use. No one who knows what dual booting is should be dumb enough to want 2 or more OS’s on a single drive.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Ooh, active hostility toward people who might consider switching. Another bold strategy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's cool that you do it that way. But why do you care how other people do it? And like... You seem really fucking emotional about it.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago

🤣 playing the old “emotional” card so soon? You have to at least wait until the person says something in a remotely even frustrated way before trying that old chestnut.