this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
422 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86159 readers
3277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah, not all of us. When switch 2 came out (and because I wanted a hand held) I looked at it, poked at in the shop and decided to buy a DS instead. $80 vs $650. If I'd been feeling more generous, I would have gotten a Retroid pocket 5 or something. I didn't need it.

The switch 2 is shiny, but it didn't fill any niche for me that one of my other rigs couldn't do (Wii, Wii u, $100 emulation box I built).

"Bigger, better, faster" is a mug's game. It cannot be won and it's the lynchpin of capitalism. The way to win is to not play.

Gaming is a luxury good. If the big players are going to go full retard, let them. Let it all burn while you find greener pastures.

This goes for all tech (and luxury goods), IMHO. Do more with less.

Reject the status ladder → identify the actual function → satisfy it with the smallest tool that works → enjoy the absurdity.