this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
11639 readers
4 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Most US markets are effectively duopolies or "triopolies" at most. But even then, that's really stretching it. Because while two or three ISPs cover a city or metro, the neighborhood one lives in really determines the carrier. This part of town might only get cable from Comcast. While another part of town only gets it from Cox. That's really simplifying it, as maybe a consumer also has (slower) bonded DSL in their area, plus there's also home 5G and now Starlink. Fiber (either FTTC or FTTH) has made good headway, but it's still not ubiquitous. Your house or apartment building might have fiber; the one next door doesn't.
So there's a teensy bit of competition. But not really.
Cellular service has seen some of that competition on being honest with fees, but that's because of MVNOs. But traditional non-wireless ISPs really don't have that competition.