Out of Context Comics

2721 readers

29 users here now

Comic panels taken out of comics so we can make fun of them!! We love the golden age stuff!

Rules:

Comics must come from actual comic books. No AI or Photoshops.
Single panels are preferred.
Comics should be unintentionally funny. Spider-man cracking wise is not what this is about.
Don't be a dick.
I can't believe I've had to add this... NO RACISM.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m_f@lemmy.world

TachyonTele@piefed.social

m_f@discuss.online

m_f@midwest.social

213

There's a problem with my Bat-Hole! (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by RegularJoe@lemmy.world to c/outofcontextcomics@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Batman is waist deep in a hole. He peers into the hole and exclaims, "There's a problem with my Bat-Hole!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] THB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is it just me or does this look more like a purposely made modern panel that's been distressed?

[–] Dima@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Gemini thinks the speech bubble has been edited, but the panel is an original from "The bat-mite bandits" issue, note however that I don't think the issue number matches up and I'm not sure where to find a copy of the comics online to verify, so it could just be an AI hallucination

This specific panel is from Batman #141, published by DC Comics in August 1961. The story in this issue is titled "The Bat-Mite Bandits." In the unedited comic, the panel depicts Batman attempting to crawl out of a deep pit or trap, and his dialogue actually reads: "I can't make it! My strength is gone!" The "bat-hole" line is completely a modern photoshop edit circulating online as a meme.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The Bat-Mite Bandits" is from Detective Comics #289, not Batman #141, so at least some of that is hallucinated. The year is at least correct.

[–] Dima@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I saw the issue number didn't seem to match up, but gave up verifying it when I couldn't find a source to view the actual comics from that era to find the original panel. Was hoping it would be something that the LLM would be able to magically pull from it's training data or the web, but I'm guessing it was hampered by the same lack of a digital copy of comics from the era that stopped me from looking into it further.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

It's really annoying that AIs get such simple, easily verifiable things wrong and confidently state the incorrect info as fact. What a colossal waste of money and resources!

[–] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I appreciate your skepticism

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You mean AI slop?

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

I mean if it is fake it can be done without AI.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried to duckduckgo it, found nothing. Nothing within the ID tag, sometimes there's the data of what prompt they used.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I've noticed DDG has gotten pretty shitty when it comes to search results lately. Guessing MS is working at cutting out the wild web (and ddg uses bing as its backend).