this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
299 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

12117 readers
443 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

because voters demanded it. Carney swung 30 points by killing the carbon levy.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep. We don't, as a species, seem equipped to handle it intelligently. It's too slow-moving and abstract.

There's issues where politicians deviate from the average person, but it's not most things, and this isn't an example. "Takes climate change seriously, after all their other problems" describes like 90%+ of everybody.

Edit: Well, maybe 70%, and another 20% that deny some aspect of it.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Carbon taxes also won't solve anything. At best it's a token effort, A carbon tax is just pushed to the consumers, making quality of life worse.

There are studies that if you completely and radically reorganized how we work and live and how wealth is distributed, we could have higher standards of living while only consuming 30% of energy and resources.

But there is no way to get there because the power of the neoliberal plutocrats is too strong. And they employ the smartest people on earth to craft the best propaganda to keep and grow their power. It's not about humanity as a species or human nature, but about the current absolute power of capitalism globally.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Not burning fossil fuels is always pushed to consumers. Most stuff consumers use involves some of it, and most people prefer the stuff, whether that's rational or not.

we could have higher standards of living while only consuming 30% of energy and resources.

Riiiight. Have you ever had to organise or build something? It all takes resources, and nobody is working with a ton of slack. Unless that study is assuming all kinds of futuristic physical infrastructure just magically appears to carry the burden, it doesn't make sense.

If we all lived at a basic third-world kind of standard, we could probably do it on 30% of the resources. If you want to own a car or have a lot of privacy, you're SOL, though. And even there it'd take time to rebuild things to accommodate the new system.