this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
171 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

86127 readers
2825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a lot of words just to reiterate what OC said. None of your examples disagree with the fact that these companies are using AI for a ton of stuff they're not good at. And the stuff it is good at are not bottlenecks. If you removed LLMs from the face of the planet today, code quality will not suffer significantly. Sure, doing code review en masse is good. But that is not what was holding back computer programming. It's existence is not progressing software in any significant way either. It's a nice to have, not a must have. Code was fine for four decades without LLMs. Indeed it makes me wonder, if a machine learning model was purpose made to do code review, instead of general purpose LLMs doing it, how much better it could be, if we actually leveraged what they're good at.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the stuff it is good at are not bottlenecks.

Disagree. Code review done right is a virtually impossible bottleneck for most companies to handle, so in the past they didn't do it and we have the shitshow of security and other bugs that we are experiencing today.

If you removed LLMs from the face of the planet today, code quality will not suffer significantly.

But LLMs aren't going anywhere, and they are already being used to find vulnerabilities by hats both white and black. They are also finding functional bugs that affect life safety and financial stability.

Code was fine for four decades

The way that municipal water was fine for centuries before chlorination. Cholera outbreaks were just one of those unavoidable realities, like mass school shooting events in the US.

if a machine learning model was purpose made to do code review, instead of general purpose LLMs doing it, how much better it could be, if we actually leveraged what they’re good at.

From what I have seen over the past year, this type of specialization is happening, and the progress is real and significant.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Comparing code bugs to cholera. Nice way to be utterly disconnected from reality and what really matters in life. Let's burn the planet down and waste all of our clean water because of code review.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club -1 points 1 day ago

We were burning the planet down for billionaire yachts and dollar store trinkets so.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 0 points 1 day ago

We're getting to a point where code failures are causing deaths, large numbers of deaths... Boeing's MAX10 was a code / design / training / management failure.