this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

Computer RPG Games

854 readers
17 users here now

Community for CRPG games and other RPG gaming discussions. Witcher, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Baldurs Gate as well as indie RPGs (Underrail, Avernum, Space Wreck etc.). Focus is on CRPGs, but discussion around JPRGs, ARPGs and hybrid games with RPG components is also welcome.

Tabletop/pen & paper RPG discussion is not a good fit for this community. Check out !rpg@ttrpg.network for TT/P&P RPG discussions.

Memes are not banned, but the overwhelming focus is on discussions, releases and articles. Try and post memes (on an occasional basis) that would make people who don't like memes admit "OK! That was a good one!".


Some other gaming communities across Threadi:


RPG Game communities on Threadi:


General gaming communities on Threadi:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No spam, illegal content, or games with excessive, non-artistic NSFW content (e.g. hentai or porn games).

  4. Please stay on topic, cRPG adjacent games or even JRPGs are fine. Try to include topics / games that have a strong roleplaying component to them.


Thank you to macniel for the community icon!


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately Throne of Bhaal is... not super great. It was originally intended to be a full third game, but had to be monstrously cut down and made into an expansion instead. There's just so much cut content and so many missing threads to a lot of the content, so much railroading instead of actually giving options on how to do things. Main plot of it is kinda bad, the villain can't hold a candle to Irenicus, it's a bit of a grind with all the combat, overall it has a bit of a "slapped together" feel to it.

It does have its moments, but it pales in comparison with BG2 proper in my opinion. I think the people that enjoy it are power gamers who like playing around with High Level Abilities, or like the tactical challenges (especially with mods like Sword Coast Stratagems and Ascension).

Watcher's Keep is a very cool dungeon though, that's the best part of the expansion. And it's nice to get some closure and companion epilogues, even though WOTC and Larian retconned a lot of those. But skipping it altogether and considering the end of Shadows of Amn to be the end of BG2 is honestly valid.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's at least one character in BG3 act 3 that was alive that shouldn't be if the base game was where you stopped, and I found out that was in the expansion. There's another that I see a lot of people freaking out over how they were portrayed in BG3, seemingly specifically if you romanced that character in BG2, but so far in this run, that character's representation in BG3 still makes sense to me.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let's agree to disagree with that one. BG2 Viconia is a complicated and traumatised character, not a one-note cartoon villain. I don't particularly see the throughline. And her whole romance arc, especially in ToB is that she's capable of change.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Well, we'll see how I feel after Throne of Bhaal, but she sure spends a lot of the base game being that character, and she worships a cartoon villain of a goddess.