this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
285 points (99.0% liked)
me_irl
8040 readers
288 users here now
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Personal experience is wildly unscientific.
If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights.
Do you know how they figured out how much energy is in food? The burned it. Literally burned, with fire. You may be surprised to learn that's not what our bodies do.
If you're eating processed food from a factory, the estimate of energy contained in the food (note, this is not what you'll absorb from the food) may be fairly accurate, but if you ever cook at home, then you're just adding a wild guess on top of an educated guess. You may as well just throw some darts at some numbers and save yourself some time.
Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done.
And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight.
No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox.