this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
220 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

86010 readers
3359 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 18 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone hyped on AI data centers is forgetting there's no air in space with which to conduct the heat away. A human body could take over 24 hours to freeze solid in space because the only option is for the heat to radiate.

Than there's the part where disposable rockets and satellites like starlink are literally destroying the ozone CFC style.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They’re just going to have kilometers wide radiator panels 🧐

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

That shit was actually funny to see in one of the AI slop white papers.

There are probably solutions, but pumping fluid kilometers there and back is a freaking sell

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca -1 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

nobody actually cares .. nobody wants the damn things.. they can fuck off to space where they can blow up.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 5 points 21 hours ago

they can fuck off to space where they can blow up.

That's also a problem, if you like having an ozone

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

Donald Kessler would like to have a word about that.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You do know launching a rocket is kinda polluting the world right? We kinda ok with it because it's not a common thing to launch a rocket into space.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

nobody wants the damn things he says as he types on a website hosted in a data centre, protected by cloudflare one of the biggest data centre users in the world

you don’t like data centres but people sure love youtube and facebook which comes out of them

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The bottom panel is vastly different from the top

He's saying cars should have seat belts and the other guy wants to improve society

She could improve her situation (and society) by simply not buying headphones made by slaves, there are plenty of options out there, she has made a conscious choice to buy slave headphones and now has the audacity to complain?

Both the car driver and peasant had no choice about their situations

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

She isn't wearing headphones. She lives in a world where enough people don't care about the things she cares about to keep the system going

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 16 hours ago

it’s really irrelevant, the situations are completely different

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2024/05/14/why-the-rise-of-sustainability-is-a-shift-in-consumer-conciousness/

one is a safety feature, the other is a worker demanding rights, she is complaining about a product she doesn’t have to buy

they could make the cartoon relèvent by having a worker in the apple slave factory complaining but then that would ruin the strawman