this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46533 readers
493 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I was doing groceries and I thought some edamame would be nice. There was store brand, and also one with a label in Japanese, which I mistakenly assumed meant that it was imported from Japan.

Now I happen to like Japanese food from Japan better than Japanese food from America, so I went with the bag with the Japanese label.

Well, I pulled it out today to cook some and noticed that it has a Proposition 65 label mentioning lead exposure. I'm not used to seeing this on food. I also thought it was strange, because Japanese goods usually have better quality than this.

As it turns out, it's not from Japan at all. It was imported from China!

On its own, importing soybeans from China doesn't sound that awful. But they didn't just import soybeans. They called them Edamame, which is specifically the Japanese word for soybeans. Not only that, but they wrote "Mukimi Edamame" in big Japanese letters at the top of the front of the packaging, to fool unsuspecting shoppers like me into thinking it's a product of Japan.

If it weren't for the lead contamination, then this would only be a simple matter of cultural appropriation, and possibly false advertising. But no, apparently they contain lead. Why are US stores even allowed to sell this? Why was it allowed through customs? What US distributor decided to import a bunch of lead contaminated soybeans?

This is not okay!

A bag of frozen vegetables labeled "Mukimi Edamame" in Japanese characters

The back side of the same bag, with a label that says "Warning: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals including lead, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov/food"

Another view of the back side of the bag, with a label that says "Product of China"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

A wide range of products and businesses in California have scary looking Prop 65 warnings. Most restaurants have them posted. Just disregard it. They're internal California politicking, and don't represent a meaningful danger.

At one point, a group opposed to meat consumption tried to get a Prop 65 carcinogen warning stuck on all meat in California (though thankfully, that fell through.

One day, we will get our shit together in California, and you won't see stuff like this.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This is bullshit. Have they not heard of "the boy who cried wolf"? If they throw a meaningless label on everything warning about potential lead exposure, it loses meaning. Then once people learn to ignore these labels, suddenly nothing's stopping them from ingesting products that are actually contaminated with lead. Because, you know, we already made those labels meaningless.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Turns out everything has some association with cancer https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.047142

So when one group introduces a law saying we should label anything with a cancer risk, nobody can argue against it.... but once the law is in place, it's now a tool which people can use against their pet peeves, and since everything has some association with cancer, you get the label on everything.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

This is why I've always been against "excess of caution." It reminds me of that spongebob episode where he breaks his butt and becomes a recluse to avoid danger. It's no way to live.

Even the term "excess" implies that it's too much, it's being taken too far.

There will always be risk. It can't be eliminated. We can mitigate it, but there's no sense in trying to minimize it beyond a reasonable degree. It will only create unforeseen issues. Such as making warning labels meaningless, resulting in people ignoring them even when they matter.