I'm tempted to try a 32er
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
76 points (97.5% liked)
Bicycles
5999 readers
115 users here now
Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just the bike industry trying to convince everyone you need something new and special like "all you friends from downhilling". Money making is the aim. I would stick with 26ers.
Anyone who has ridden a larger wheelbase can tell you you’re wrong. 27.5 and 29 are much smoother than 26 because of physics. Smaller wheel size falls into holes easier and you feel every bump.
Hell there are even 32 and 36 for taller riders starting to show up and some enduro riders have considered swapping to 32 for the added smoothness.
The penny farthing is coming back.
Sure, going to put 32" on my city cargo bike haha. Smoother rides can also be achieved with more rubber like a higher tyre. Doesn't it?
For sure but you’ll often run into issues putting wider tires on. Most frames only accept a narrow range of widths. I ride a 27.5 with 2.8” tires which makes the outside diameter just about the same as a 29x2.3” but with more cushion. My old bones can’t handle the impact from a bad rim hit any more.