this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
186 points (97.0% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3431 readers
1115 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In an intelligent, rational country demsocialists and liberals would each have their own separate party.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The US is constitutionally saddled with first past the post voting, which makes more than two parties difficult to represent at the national level. For some reason the two existing parties are unwilling to change that.

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is literally false. The states control the voting, and often allocate local things to the lower levels. There's nothing stopping us (except boomer's deep concern for housing prices and a shocking willingness to throw future generations under the bus for it) from switching to Condorcet-complete voting systems with lottery options.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

No we aren't. It's tradition. We can switch to STAR

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Misinformation. I literally vote rank choice in the US.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Over a dozen states have already banned ranked choice voting. The establishment knows that if it were to catch on then elected officials will more accurately reflect the actual will of the people and undermine the liberal hegemony, so they banned it.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

demsocs are liberals

Clearly the liberals disagree.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Liberals also think they are on the left, so what the disagree on is irrelevant

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here in the US people use liberal and left interchangeably out of ignorance. But the liberals being referenced in this story understand that they are not left wing which is why they refer to themselves as "centrists." Demsocs are to their left. Demsocs might be to your right, but demsocs are definitely left wing in the context of US politics. We have established over and over again that to more radical people such as yourself, demsocs are "just liberals" and not left wing. That's fine, that's your perspective. The liberals who call themselves centrists have a different perspective, and theirs is far more common in US politics than yours, and therefore it is very relevant to anyone who cares about what's happening in US politics.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Demsocs being to their left is as meaningless as Democrats being to the left of Republicans when they all defend the same systems of oppression and want to work within the lose systems

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago

You can fight people barely to the left of you

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kinda. The establishment liberals are trying to discipline the social democrats and prevent them from gaining in influence. However, the social democrats are, at the moment, not actually in favor of establishing socialism nor doing what is required to do so. It's liberal infighting.

The more millitent rank and file of the DSA is largely what's pushing this grassroots support in this wave, but without a correct analysis of the structure and role of the capitalist state the DSA's reformist strategy is a dead-end.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's liberal infighting.

So I have been told by at least a dozen people with lemmy.ml handles.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure. I don't see what the handle has to do with it.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The love to compartmentalize groups of people and make broad generalizations.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

What makes you think that?