this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
88 points (98.9% liked)

Slop.

876 readers
349 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

article https://united24media.com/world/netflix-extends-russian-animated-series-masha-and-the-bear-whats-wrong-with-that-20120

The CCD described the series as part of Russia’s broader soft power strategy.

“It is not just a cartoon, but an instrument of Russian ‘soft power’,” the Center stated.

According to the Center’s analysis, the animated series promotes a positive image of Russia through the character of the Bear, portrays other nations in a negative light through the behavior of the main character Masha, and normalizes Soviet symbolism and militaristic themes.

Experts emphasize that protecting the information space for children remains an important component of national security.

Traces of Russian propaganda

Critics contend that the issue is not any individual symbol appearing in the series, but the overall narrative it constructs about Russia.

Across the show, Russian cultural motifs—including folklore, traditional family values, and national symbols such as the bear—are depicted as welcoming, gentle, and universally appealing. Even references to the Soviet era, such as the appearance of a red five-pointed star in one episode, are presented in a child-friendly setting.

On their own, these cultural elements may seem harmless. However, critics argue that taken together they function as a form of soft power, introducing young international audiences to an idealized and carefully curated image of Russian culture and and national identity while downplaying or omitting the political realities associated with them.

The discussion is especially sensitive because some of the symbols featured in the series—including Soviet iconography—are closely linked in parts of Eastern Europe to repression, occupation, and other historical abuses. By presenting these symbols outside their historical context, framed instead as nostalgic or innocent, can make them more effective instruments of cultural influence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feed_el_Castro@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bullshit, though, they were not targeting the entire ethnic groups of Poles, Balts or Ukrainians. Crimean Tatars sure, Germans it's harder to argue, but those other 3 are literally made up. I loved finding this on Wikipedia:

It is estimated that the NKVD's subordinate destruction battalions killed some 2,000 Estonian civilians, and 50–60,000 people were deported deep into the USSR [after Estonia's liberation from Nazism]

So, who were these poor repressed Estonians? :(

Resistance groups were organised by Germans in August 1941 into the Omakaitse (lit. 'Self-defence'), which had between 34,000[6] and 40,000 members,[7] mainly based on the Kaitseliit, dissolved by the Soviets.[6] Omakaitse was in charge of clearing the German army's rear of Red Army soldiers, NKVD members, and Communist activists. Within a year its members killed 5,500 Estonian residents

Shoutout to NATOpedia for calling civilians murdering Nazi batallions "resistance groups"

[...] As the Red Army advanced, a general mobilization was announced, officially supported by Estonia's last Prime Minister Jüri Uluots. By April 1944, 38,000 Estonians had been drafted

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

Also, it's really fucking weird to translate "истребительный батальон" as "destruction batalion".