Politics

1220 readers

324 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

Trump abruptly cancels plan to sign bipartisan bill aimed at lowering cost of housing unless Senate approves Save America Act (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 day ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a statement on social media, Trump said: “Today’s Housing News Conference and Signing is hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT, which I consider to be a National Emergency.”

A day earlier, the House of Representatives approved the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, which is intended to lower rents and home prices by reducing federal regulations, streamlining environmental reviews, speeding up the construction process and curbing the influence of corporate landlords by limiting their ability to purchase single-family homes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Coffee isn't ready yet, so I'm basing this entirely on the blurb:

A day earlier, the House of Representatives approved the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, which is intended to lower rents and home prices by reducing federal regulations,

That sounds bad.

streamlining environmental reviews,

That definitely sounds worse.

speeding up the construction process

More bad.

and curbing the influence of corporate landlords by limiting their ability to purchase single-family homes.

That last one sounds like it's a good thing, until you take a second to consider the source. Most likely it aids his buddies somehow.

Do we really want this signed?

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 2 points 18 hours ago

The last one isn't as impactful as it sounds. "Corporate" landlords are anyone with more than 10 properties. Something like 60% of the market is Mom-and-Pop landlords that only own five or six houses.

We need crippling progressive taxes for each residence owned beyond your primary.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Environmental “concerns” are used by NIMBYs to jam-up urban infill housing at the permitting stage.

I’m sorry for the weeds and rats in empty lots, but better to have urban housing than suburban sprawl.