No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
view the rest of the comments
Yes. As you may or may not remember, the Sackler family spent billions on and made hundreds of billions off of getting the American south addicted to opiates over the 1990s and early 2000s. Every single doctor and hospital involved was sued by their former patients. There are still billboards up in some southern states advertising law firms that specialize in suing doctors over developed addictions.
So any doctor that graduated in the last 16 years has had one specific thing drilled into their head: Do. Not. Treat. Pain.
Because you will be sued if your patient is an addict or becomes an addict.
This has always affected doctors in the US, but the medical profession is a calling regardless. If you want money there are so many better pathways, leaving exactly three reasons people become doctors:
3: They have an uncontrollable natural urge to try to help others.
So 2/3rds of doctors are not going to fight their training and just try to prescribe pain meds as little as possible.
Of the remain 1/3rd of doctors or so, the ones that genuinely love helping others and want to deliver the best possible care, one bad experience with addicts can permanently change their attitude, and they may get hundreds of experiences per shift if they happen to do their residency in an ER inside any American city.
On top of all of this is the inherent gender and racial biases in medicine, and American medicine in general. Women's pain is taken less seriously. It was in medical textbooks world wide until the 2020s that black people felt less pain and were genetically more prone to addiction. There was a literal course in every MA, RN, LVN, MD, etc course about "how different races feel and express pain."
So if you want pain relief, you better have both the vital stats showing you are experiencing pain (which is awful for chronic pain sufferers who no longer have high BP/High pulse from their pain), and you better be a white man with a conservative lifestyle/look (because we know the gays are more likely to pop pills[This is literally in medical textbooks]), you better get lucky that you have a doctor willing to prescribe pain management, and even if you qualify at that point you better not ever ask for pain meds, period, regardless of your situation. As it only takes one single nurse or doctor to put drug seeking behavior on your chart to ruin your chances at ever receiving pain management ever again.
Every one broaching the topic in any possible way.
Here's Johns Hopkins, one of the leading voices in American Medicine, saying gay men tend to use crystal meth. Here's a meta study referenced in at least 30 textbooks(I stopped counting the books in the cited by section) saying all 'sexual minorities' are much more likely to have substance abuse issues, but bixsexual women are the most likely to be long term addicts. Here's a more up to date article saying Trans people are by far the most likely to be long term addicts. That last one is only in one textbook but is directly cited in two organization's drug policies.
As a trans guy, I got about 50/50 “she” versus “he” despite being a fat balding bearded guy. I’m guessing that factored into it too.
Ah, yes, truly how math works. "I will break all doctors down into three arbitrary, mutually exclusive categories and then decide that they're evenly distributed."
How you wrote this and thought "Yup, sounds right" is beyond me.
I see you're still stalking me and you still haven't learned anything about hyperbole for argumentative purposes. No, for my ASD friends I do not literally mean, "2/3rds here's quantifiable evidence of something no one has ever quantified because doctors are allegedly heroes (if you're a straight white male) and here are my mathematical sources and proofs for this very minor and entirely immaterial point of this particular argument."
Yeah, sure pal. I think the last time I interacted with you was a few days ago when you were being a little pissbaby in a thread about Zohran Mamdani, and then god only knows before that. I found this thread naturally and only stopped at your comment for how insufferably stupid your anti-doctor spiel is. "It's just hyperbole, bro. Baselessly claiming 2/3 of medical doctors are egotists who don't care about helping others and trying to assign paper-thin logic to it is hyperbole."
The fact you're calling this "stalking" shows you're deeply unwell with abysmal judgment, but then so does most of what you put on Lemmy.
Edit: Wait, I just realized: what do you mean "still haven't learned"? Are you mistaking me for someone else?