this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)
NZ Politics
872 readers
3 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
IMHO the tax brackets should be defined by a minimum wage multiplier.
E.g. someone part time on minimum wage: 0%, full time minimum wage: 5% and so on... Go as high as necessary.
Corporate tax? Every $ they're paying tax on could have been used to pay their employees better.
You know that the tax is paid on profit right; money they pay to employees is an expense and thus not taxed.
They could pay their employees more and reduce their tax burden currently and in the Greens tax plan.
Lets run a thought experiment:
And another:
Obviously there is a happy medium between 0-100%; that exact number is up for debate. But lowering the corp tax rate does not necessarily incentivize higher employee pay. In fact the opposite would be true in many cases; especially in mature industries where labor is not constrained.
sure and they still can and take it from profit, that lowers they're profit and fence thief tax. Seems unlikely though
What about median income instead of minimum wage?
Hmm, maybe. I suspect that the median income is quite close to minimum wage :-/ at least in magnitude.
Mean income as a floor for the larger tax rates would shift the tax burden up over the mean... and egregiously large incomes would drag that floor up.