this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
139 points (93.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

42539 readers
589 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0xKesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ahh.. but humans are primates?

So wouldn't that make both true? Other primates would display human like qualities, while the inverse of 'humans do primate things' also holds true?

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can see what OP is getting at but it's really an argument around semantics, and sentence structure.

For example, we don't say "Some fruits are similar to Apples", because it sounds daft and it's redundant.

On the other hand saying "Pears are similar to Apples" is of course fine, and helpful to someone who's never seen a Pear.

Like most shower thoughts, they're pointing out something obvious, but in an emotive way. "Primates aren't like us, we are like them!"

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In terms of biology, specifically botany, we do say some fruits are similar to apples. This comparison seems like a biological one too.

It's important to combat anthropocentric bias. Primates came first we're actually the newest ones, so if we share behaviors, they did it first and we copied them.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Humans are in the set of primates, but not all primates are human.

[–] mech@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Still, your showerthought says "a subset of primates are doing primate things".

[–] ElderReflections@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly — 'Like' is a comparison and doesn't imply belonging to a set. Someone can be 'like a piece of shit' without belonging to a greater class of shits

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well humans are the newest primates so anything we do similar to other primates, they did it first and it's us who copied them.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

No we're not.

Heck, chimpanzees and bobobos only branched from each other like a million years ago.

Modern day non-humaj primates evolved from common ancestors, just like us.