392
Iranian star Parastoo Ahmadi sentenced to 74 lashes for singing without hijab
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
392 points (96.9% liked)
World News
56646 readers
2082 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Since you cant decypher sarcasm (you cant seem to make sense of it, you admitted), your premise is "people want the iranian regime to succeed" which is a straw man. You need to do a steel man instead. You have no founded argument because you chose to do a straw man instead of a steel man.
If you have any trouble interpreting or comprehending that let me know.
I never said such a thing, so maybe it is your own understanding that is flawed: I said that what you said was nonsense, while also being sarcastic, i.e. ”sarcastic nonsense”.
And no, I’ve met actual –not straw but flesh and bones– people on here who said Iran were the good guys, as well as Hamas and that the October 7 attacks were justified.
So maybe, if you want to have a normal discussion, next time don’t act like a massive jerk.
"all these"
How many have you found to say "all these" iran regime apologists? Give me the huge number you have found. Whats the percentage of political comments on the iran war on lemmy that confirms your assertion that you claim is not flawed at all. Surely you have copious amounts of comments you can definitely say there is no nuance and unequivocally want the regime to win over the people of iran winning. Especially when Iran is just defending itself from aggressors.
Until you do that, you haven't done shit. I will act however I want. I dont care about your feelings, I demand you to defend your assertions with facts and data. But you fail to provide it time and time again. You are a straw manning and have no ability to attempt a steel man.
You gave two earlier and one was just a dude from turkey saying "go iran!"
I dont know if counting is your strong suit, but seeing two comments is not a lot, certainly not enough to warrant "all these"
Ahhh yes, acting like a massive narcissist jerk again I see, ‘cause that worked so well last time…
I won’t deal with obtuse idiots who can’t have a normal discussion, so I will say: go out and have a look. You’re on the source itself.
I'm sorry I made you cry, facts over feelings next time brother. Welcome to adult conversations on the internet.
Ahh yes, only being able to respond with sarcastic idiocy and claiming you made someone cry is peak adult conversation…
Again, you cant defend your claims. Keep being proud in your ignorance and claiming to be the mature one here. You got called out, cant substantiate any of your assertions, and youre lashing out instead of admitting you made grand claims without evidence.
You are the adultest one here certainly. I believe that, it does take age to lack the ability to reflect. I am an asshole. I understand I hurt peoples feelings. But I care about your data more than your idea of decorum, whereas you care more about your ego.
Only one of us here is downvoting the other, and I think that is telling of which one of us is the person with the emotional tolerance of a toddler. Keep telling yourself you are a grown adult though, I am sure that gets you everything you want.
What makes you think I want to defend my claims against someone who decided to act like a jerk and mock me? You act like we’re on a high-school playground and suddenly want to talk “adult”. Doesn’t work that way. Better luck next time
lol. Again, apologies for making you cry. Defend your claims better next time with data instead of your fee fees, and maybe you get treated better. Don't open your mouth with baseless claims if you can't back it up. Food for thought. Open your mind to the possibilities of being wrong and you will learn lots in life young whipper snapper.
You have no argument. Your claims are baseless. You will not defend them. We're all flawed. I am an asshole. You are intellectually dishonest.
Ahh yes criticism = crying. How very adult of you.