Uplifting News

19155 readers

572 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

wolfeh@lemmy.world

Flummoxed@lemmy.today

sga@lemmings.world

sga013@lemmy.world

plantmoretrees@lemm.ee

Aatube@kbin.melroy.org

Aatube@lemmy.world

NickwithaC@lemmy.world

sga@piefed.social

375

Young women now have 'close to zero' risk of cervical cancer death after HPV jab (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It was an uphill battle to get it rolled out for girls initially. There was a lot of fear mongering about how this would turn them all into sluts.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Fucking stupid argument, most people who have HPV don't even know it, how preventing the virus would change anything in their behavior?

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Because they felt it would give permission for girls to have sex without consequence. And you know how much conservatives love for there to be punishments for girls and women having sex.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, I'm aware that humans are prone to flights of fancy. Doesn't change the fact that I'm disappointed that a science field doesn't listen to science when making decisions.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they needed to do more testing and such before rolling it out for boys and men. Because they could prove the cervical cancer link more easily and they could get it approved for girls first.

It's disappointing, but it's available now.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would love to believe it was some decision making tree, comparing number needed to treat vs number needed to harm, but the most likely explanation is that there was funding for cervical cancer that this worked off of, and that was used to get the first human test subjects (all women, cause men don't have cervixes, silly. Just ignore all the men with cervixes).

Never mind that 90% of drugs only go through testing with just men cause "women are just men with different hormones patterns and more statistical noise". But the reverse logic is clearly not respected, we have to test this drug on men before we can approve it for them. Ah patriarchy, if it isn't you, it's capitalism.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Usually patriarchy and capitalism team up to ignore women's health issues honestly. I'm sorry this one got caught and they prioritized girls and women first.

Because of HPV’s causal association with cervical cancer, the original vaccine trials focused on females, and consequently, the vaccine was approved for females aged nine to 26 years. This approach was perfectly reasonable, given what was known at the time. Unfortunately, this approval also fit within an existing cultural narrative that HPV was a woman’s problem. We have come to refer to this overidentification of HPV with females, and its subsequent impact on primary prevention efforts, as the “feminization of HPV.” The process of feminization occurs when an issue is socially constructed as focused on females,3 which can impact how issues are perceived by the public and addressed by the government and other organizations.

The feminization process was, in some sense, the result of an accidental synergy between the known science and our long history of sexism. The decision to license the vaccine only for females was a “perfect storm” of science, politics, economics, and socially constructed beliefs regarding gender roles. In the forthcoming shift from the quadrivalent to the nonavalent vaccine that will undoubtedly involve confusion regarding guidelines, dosage, clinical practice behavior, and health messages, new approaches could correct gender disparities in vaccine delivery. We call for a three-part strategy to address the feminization of HPV, which we hope will foster equity in the prevention of HPV-related diseases.

Even back in 2016 there was a push to correct this.