this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
88 points (91.5% liked)

Games

25230 readers
56 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
88
The Sad Unusability of Video Game Reviews (bottomfeeder.substack.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by inlandempire@jlai.lu to c/games@sh.itjust.works
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"So I was trying to write reviews of a bunch of hit indie games I played recently. Then I got overwhelmed by the pointlessness of video game reviews these days and had to take a long nap.

And, I mean, pro reviews are pointless, right? If a game has a big enough budget or following and isn’t actively on fire, it gets a 9. If it is a competently made but low-budget indie, like mine, it gets a 7. If you read the actual review (nobody does), it’s a collection of facts about the game you could easily get from watching the trailer. Throw in a couple of comments from the reviewer about whether they like this genre or not, mix in 3 or 4 ham-handed political comments, and you got a review! Hit send!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That, and let’s plays and streamers ate the bottom out of the review market. People would much rather watch some gameplay by a neutral party (a person just playing the game, not writing a review) and judge for themselves whether they want to play it or not.

The other issue with reviews (solved by LPs/streamers as well) is the problem of taste. Even if you had a perfect world where reviewer corruption didn’t exist, you’d still have to find reviewers whose tastes match your own. If a game you were anticipating gets a poor review, you have to decide whether it actually deserved that review or if the reviewer just doesn’t like the style of the game, but you might like it.

This last one might seem easy enough to overcome with genre-based expert reviewers but I don’t think it is. There have been a lot of times where someone told me “Oh you like Roguelikes? You should try ___” and I really didn’t like their suggestion. There are a million different dimensions to game design and many of them cross the boundaries of genres, blurring the lines. Thus it becomes extremely hard to find other people (never mind expert reviewers) with matching tastes and get trustworthy game recommendations from them.