Games

25230 readers

56 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

The Sad Unusability of Video Game Reviews (bottomfeeder.substack.com)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by inlandempire@jlai.lu to c/games@sh.itjust.works

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"So I was trying to write reviews of a bunch of hit indie games I played recently. Then I got overwhelmed by the pointlessness of video game reviews these days and had to take a long nap.

And, I mean, pro reviews are pointless, right? If a game has a big enough budget or following and isn’t actively on fire, it gets a 9. If it is a competently made but low-budget indie, like mine, it gets a 7. If you read the actual review (nobody does), it’s a collection of facts about the game you could easily get from watching the trailer. Throw in a couple of comments from the reviewer about whether they like this genre or not, mix in 3 or 4 ham-handed political comments, and you got a review! Hit send!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every indie dev at some point gets supermad about Steam reviews. However, 99 times out of 100, skimming the reviews on the game’s front page will tell you everything you need to know.

I think I get both sides of the matter. Some devs seem to be mad simply because the review is not under their control, and the player isn't shy saying what's wrong with the game. But some reviews are like, "2/10 Chinese restaurant, there were no burgers".

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tbh, to me nonsense negative reviews are a good sign. They don't influence my opinion about the product ("I'm not looking for burgers so I don't care that this guy was disappointed that there were no burgers"), but they show me that the company doesn't force the deletion of bad reviews.

I've had it a few times before that e.g. I went to a doctor with perfect 5-star-reviews, only to find out that they suck and they sue anyone who leaves negative reviews.

If I see perfect 5-stars on something, that's when I get really sceptical. I'd never go to a doctor, a restaurant or a craftsman with perfect 5-star score.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I think it's a good signal for us users, but for game devs it's still a problem. Indie games get less reviews, and a negative review means less exposure — the number might not mean anything, but plenty people still act like it did.

Plus game devving is artistic expression, and if there's something that pisses plenty creators off, it's when their creations get misunderstood.

[–] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://xkcd.com/1098/

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

I got lost and wandered into the world's creepiest cemetery, where the headstones just had names and star ratings. Freaked me out. When I got home I tried to leave the cemetery a bad review on Yelp, but as my hand hovered over the 'one star' button I felt this distant chill ...

There's always a relevant xkcd.