this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)
Explain Like I'm Five
21443 readers
51 users here now
Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're basically asking about the difference between an authorized vs unauthorized biography.
If you sell the rights, that's just getting some nominal fee in exchange for your participation in the process. You may have insights and knowledge of certain events that aren't easy to find without your help, so some media production company may pay for you to fill in those gaps.
None of that is strictly necessary, though. Anyone can write about anyone else, so long as they aren't making false claims about the source, or making other negligently false claims of fact. (Don't do false advertising or libel.)
Libel is pretty hard to prove. Historically, you can probably get away with a little libel to sell books, fyi. But you didn't hear it from me.
Usually what makes it worth it is if the person in question has any works under copyright. It is usually fair game to make an unauthorized biography of a politician since very little of their public work is protected. In contrast, various artists, especially singer-songwriters, generally need to have their works be official since the copyright holders want control over how the artist is portrayed.