this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
117 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

15972 readers
368 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As road deaths increase and cycle lanes overflow with e-bikes, the Netherlands is considering a cycling speed limit of 12mph (20km/h).

The government has started a two-week trial in Houten, near Utrecht, to gauge whether freedom-loving Dutch cyclists are willing to slow down – and whether they have any idea how fast they are going in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll copy my comment on this article from a different thread


As a Dutchman, I’m not a fan of this proposed speed limit.

My natural speed at which I comfortably cycle is around 25 km/h, which is perfectly safe if you pay attention and slow down when it is necessary in order not to hinder your fellow road users. The issue is people who cycle recklessly without keeping other cyclists in mind, in my opinion.

Enforcement is the key. And we already have reckless road usage laws.

I much prefer the Belgian method, where they set a recommended speed limit with signs of 25 km/h on the bikepath. You can cycle faster, but that’s at your own risk.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can cycle faster, but that’s at your own risk.

The whole reason to regulate those things is exactly because that's not "at your own risk" since you're sharing the road or bicycle path with other people.

As I see it, in your own space you can do whatever the fuck you want whilst risking only yourself (really, go wild!), but as soon as you're in a space shared with other people where your actions can harm others, then your freedom to do whatever the fuck you want is constrained because others too have various freedoms, not least to not get killed or seriously harmed by somebody else simply because they're using the same shared space.

In practice "indicative" is the same as non-existent.

Sure, thoughtfull people who take others into account will moderate their speed in more dangerous situations, but those people would already do it anyways even in the absence of an indicative maximum and, besides, even those with the best of intention can simply be wrong in their assumption that "this is a safe speed for these conditions" (funny statistic, not quite for cycling but appropriate: around 90% of drivers thing they're "good drivers" whilst thinking most other drivers are "bad drivers") and in a crash it's often not just them who suffer from their misjudgment. Meanwhile, selfish assholes will just carry on being selfish assholes in the face of a maximum speed indication or in fact in the face of a legal speed limit which isn't enforced and just go too fast in order to shave themselves a minute or two in their trip, since assholes only moderate their "what's best for me and fuck everybody else" when forced to (meaning that they MUST get punished if they don't).

[–] kugel7c@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

20km/h is just too slow though. It turns transportation infrastructure that is quite useable on 20+ km journeys and turns it into infrastructure really only usable for short trips.

Also if you were to trying to get somewhere fast with a 20km/h speed limit that you abide by your effort would esentially be a lot of short sprints up to speed and a bunch of trundling in between, imo maybe the most annoying way to ride a bike.

I could see like 30km/h city and 40km/h country or something like this but 20 is just too low.

A 20km/h limit makes an average of ~ 20km/h impossible and i'd recon most long bike commutes find around a 20km/h average to be quite comfortable, but a 20km/h average even on flat terrain requires stints well past 20 to make up for lights and such. If it gets hilly this limit gets even more ridicoulous, depending on the grade the bike rolls way faster than 20.