this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
400 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

85355 readers
3518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm dead sick of hearing this argument. One, it's completely legalistic. The holocaust was legal too. Two, it's incorrect. The government has been in trouble for coercing private entities like this before. I'm sure it would not pass in the current supreme court. They only got away with it for so long because they did it secretly from the public.

Given the choice, this is obviously behavior that should be stopped by legal intervention or possibly green Mario. There was no punishment because the worst of it passed before it was made public, much like nobody got imprisoned for various CIA crimes or whatever. Thats it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm dead sick of hearing this argument.

boo hoo

One, it's completely legalistic.

That's because the constitution and the bill of rights are legal doctrines...

The holocaust was legal too.

True, but that was because a fascist government took power and made it legal. so far the current admin hasn't made things legal, they're just simply illegally ignoring the laws they are required to uphold.

sorry if that was too...legalistic for you.

Two, it's incorrect.

so your first point us that the concept of the constitutional violations I described are too legal (assuming you mean logically), and now you're saying it's wrong? first time I have ever heard of something being incorrectly legal.

The government has been in trouble for coercing private entities like this before. I'm sure it would not pass in the current supreme court.

am I being punk'd by an LLM right now?

They only got away with it for so long because they did it secretly from the public.

Imagine how many crimes we would know about if our government would come out and openly admit to them 🤣.

Given the choice, this is obviously behavior that should be stopped by legal intervention or possibly green Mario.

I literally cannot even take your opinions seriously anymore. you make reference to Luigi as "green Mario" as if this is Reddit.

you're still too much of a child to understand how the world works. you're probably what, early to mid 20s? you lack proper perspective that only life experience and time can teach you. you still have your rose colored glasses on and believe that you have the power to "change the world". it's admirable but you feel that way because it's a social mechanism that has been installed to keep people like you busy spinning your wheels on frivolous bullshit while the wheels spinning the grinder spin on.

justice, like history, is written by the victors. when was the last victory for the righteous? I mean a real legal victory.