this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
183 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

11984 readers
2330 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Rooki@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world
183
What the hell are we waiting for? (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago by yesman@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I suppose people are waiting to see if a prominent person is accused. Or maybe for accusations that are outrageous.

The stupidest thing about conspiracy theories is that they often assume that if "the public only knew" then something would change. "The public" doesn't give a fuck.

My opinion is that people just wanted to lock up Trump (or Clinton), and all the raped little girls are beside the point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fragments of the files are public and are hosted on DOJ website and implicate a lot of people, a lot from the circles of the president.

You talked about reasonable doubt, please provide me what's the "reasonable doubt" when:

  • DOJ says there's nobody else to investigate or prosecute (according to them Epstein was the only one that committed those crimes)
  • that means everyone else listed there did nothing wrong and releasing those files would clear them up
  • a law passed that all files (including FBI investigators notes) supposed to become public

So why would trump prefer to break law not releasing those files that would clear everyone (including himself) of those accusations?

There's no one blocking him and as mentioned there's a law actually mandating him to do it, so what's your reasonable doubt that he and his friends aren't guilty?

Not many criminals have the option of controlling their prosecutors.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The fragments of the files are public and are hosted on DOJ website and implicate a lot of people, a lot from the circles of the president.

But you won't cite any so we're still stuck at step 1.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You want me to cite 6 million files?

You talked about reasonable doubt.

So what is your reasonable doubt why he can't publish all files to clear himself of any accusation?

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I want you to cite any.

I think you might have gotten lost: You're defending the claim that there is information in the currently publicly available files to justify executing individuals. You need to showcase examples to defend that claim.