Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
I suppose people are waiting to see if a prominent person is accused. Or maybe for accusations that are outrageous.
The stupidest thing about conspiracy theories is that they often assume that if "the public only knew" then something would change. "The public" doesn't give a fuck.
My opinion is that people just wanted to lock up Trump (or Clinton), and all the raped little girls are beside the point.
You haven't linked any publically available documents yet... We're still here, at step one.
Also why are you talking about releasing the rest of the files? That has nothing to do with the claim here.
The fragments of the files are public and are hosted on DOJ website and implicate a lot of people, a lot from the circles of the president.
You talked about reasonable doubt, please provide me what's the "reasonable doubt" when:
So why would trump prefer to break law not releasing those files that would clear everyone (including himself) of those accusations?
There's no one blocking him and as mentioned there's a law actually mandating him to do it, so what's your reasonable doubt that he and his friends aren't guilty?
Not many criminals have the option of controlling their prosecutors.
But you won't cite any so we're still stuck at step 1.
You want me to cite 6 million files?
You talked about reasonable doubt.
So what is your reasonable doubt why he can't publish all files to clear himself of any accusation?
I want you to cite any.
I think you might have gotten lost: You're defending the claim that there is information in the currently publicly available files to justify executing individuals. You need to showcase examples to defend that claim.
There are so many, and it is irrelevant to the argument I'm making, but here is the latest one:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html?unlocked_article_code=1.pFA.O9yw.7LCM36hpZAuR